Search This Blog

Wednesday, January 13, 2010

CONNECTICUT MOTOR VEHICLE DEPARTMENT CHANGE OF ASSESSMENT FORM AVAILABLE HERE

In the spirit of providing solutions to problems for the people of Hartford, please feel free to download the attached form.

For any Hartford resident whose vehicle might be registered in the wrong town, feel free to download this form.

With the Mayor projecting a $40 million dollar deficit for next year, we can use all the revenue possible. Even though taxes may be cheaper in other towns, please do the right thing and help Hartford out.

TAXPAYER'S APPLICATION FOR
CHANGE OF MOTOR VEHICLE ASSESSMENT

Motor Vehicle Change of Assessment

Tuesday, January 12, 2010

IS HARTFORD CRIMESTOPPERS WORKING?


Yesterday I posted about Hartford's latest "dog and pony show" to present the crime stats for 2009.

In the comments on that posting under "Daryl K. Roberts", Hartford Police Media and Communications Coordinator Nancy Mulroy posted a link requesting people to check out Hartford Crimestoppers.

I did, and I'm very surprised by the numbers there. Hartford Crimestoppers has been in operation since August of 2008 according to their website. I'm hoping this is a mistake and that they just haven't updated their numbers, but they claim that they have resulted in 4 arrests during that time and have paid out $200.00 in rewards.

It is somewhat confusing though because it shows the "worldwide" numbers, which are impressive, updated through today, 1-12-2010 and the Hartford numbers as a year old almost, 1-29-2009. I'm not sure if that means they haven't done anything in a year, or just haven't updated in a year.

Either way, 4 arrests doesn't seem to be making a huge impact. Also, at an average reward of $50.00 per arrest, it might make people think twice about making that call.

CLICK HERE FOR HARTFORD CRIMESTOPPERS

IS HARTFORD SAFE? DO THE NUMBERS REALLY MATTER?

Let me first say, it is hard to take Mayor Perez seriously when he stands up and talks about crime. It's like looking at two polar opposites when you see the Mayor standing beside Chief Roberts. One is the image of integrity and honesty the other is Hartford's poster child for corruption.

With that being said, what is the real state of crime in Hartford?

By the city's own handout that was presented at City Hall, it paints a dismall picture if you look at the facts. The entire report is available below by clicking on "2009 Safe City Overview". Essentially the report points out an increase in homicides in 2009. Aggravated assaults increased 16.2%, burglaries increased 12% and shooting incidents increased by 9.2%

By these numbers, it would appear that the crimes that make people fear Hartford are not moving in the right direction.

I guess we should take comfort in the statements and bullet points in this report, but they seem to defy logic or any positive "marketing strategy" to make people feel good about Hartford. As an example the report states "since 2003 Violent Crime has remained constant and in 2009 increased from 1,537 to 1,619". I feel better already knowing that violent crime has remained constant. What are they thinking?

I guess that is what they call looking at the glass as half full.It's like they are trying to say "violent crime has remained constant, you think it's bad now, imagine if it increased how bad it could be".

I don't fault the Chief or the Hartford Police Department for these numbers as much as I do the administration. If we added up all of the Police Officers we have been promised by Mayor Perez at election time, the HPD would be fully staffed and in great shape. Unfortunately the department is still losing officers faster than they are being replaced, and sources tell me that by year end, we potentially could once again be below 400 officers.

In addition, City Hall sources are telling me that this year at budget time, police and fire layoffs are an almost certain reality, reducing the numbers even more.

In addition, equipment and vehicles have been another real problem. It doesn't take an expensive study to figure out that if you are short vehicles and are doubling up officers in the same car, then they are only able to produce half the results together that they might produce working on their own. By only being able to cover half as much territory, then realistically half as much criminal activity might be noticed. Therefore only half as much enforcement might take place, and potentially crime could be doubling, unchecked.

Again, we already know our Mayor has very little regard for our laws as he has been charged with violating several felony statutes himself. Is it any wonder that he may not be strong on crime prevention?

The numbers below are compiled through FBI statistics and show Hartford, CT ranked at number 24 out of 400 US Cities. Hartford is ahead of Newark, New Jersey and way ahead of Boston, Massachusetts. That in and of itself tells the story that Hartford is a violent city.

2009 City Crime RankingsCity Crime 2009 Rank Rev

2009 SAFE CITY OVERVIEW2009 Safe City Overview

Monday, January 11, 2010

THE LATEST "CRIME IS DOWN" DOG AND PONY SHOW HELD AT HARTFORD CITY HALL


I attended the latest comedy event held in the Council Chambers today. I don't know, but I just find it highly laughable to see a Mayor arrested twice on numerous felony charges talking about his crime fighting abilities. Does he even consider his own credibility and wonder how people can take him seriously when he may be facing some serious prison time in a few months?

After having the police called on me last week at City Hall when I asked the Democratic Registrar for public documents, I tried to keep a low profile today.

It took every ounce of my willpower though to not shout out a question for the Mayor.

"Mr. Mayor, do your arrests and the arrest of Councilperson Airey-Wilson and others figure into the City's crime statistics or does the state have to claim those?"

I CAN ADMIT WHEN I'M WRONG

No, not about Sean Arena and his brother Ralph and the thousands of dollars they have apparently beat Hartford out of.

Rather, the posting regarding the documents that someone(I referred to them as spineless) had sent to the Courant. The documents appeared to show that I was not paying personal property taxes for my business office, even though I haven't had an office at the address listed for several years.

I referred to the "source" of the documents as "spineless". I still feel they are because it is easy to sling allegations anonymously with out doing any checking to verify the accuracy of the documents. The person who provided the documents, who I won't name here, had every resource available to verify the documents and chose not to.They most likely knew they were wrong and hoped the Courant would just run with them without any verification

In retrospect, I wouldn't be writing on this blog if it weren't for my "sources" who provide me with information and documents. In looking back, the last thing I would call any of my sources is spineless.Sources providing me with information are actually some of the bravest people I know. They risk their careers and livelihoods by contacting me and giving me the information they do. In this era of corruption at Hartford City Hall, they all know that by contacting me, they essentially could be out of a job tomorrow.

It all comes down to the trust factor and my sources know I will protect their identity and their information at all costs. Hopefully that is why people take the risk to talk to me and forward the information they do.

Although my aggravation in that posting was directed toward those trying to "kill the messenger" and deflect attention away from the Arena's, some felt that it was also directed toward Steve Goode from the Courant.

I whole heartedly apologize to Steve Goode if that was taken as my intent. Although I only met Steve in person today, I have nothing but the highest regards for the way he handled the situation. He was extremely fair. He could have posted the documents on their face value, but he chose not to. He contacted me and then went to City Hall to try to get the full story. Only after he did that and then contacted me again, did he finally post what he found.

Both Steve Goode and Helen Ubinas from the Courant were fair in their analysis last week, and again I apologize to them if they felt any of this was directed towards them.

It is hard to make sense out of a lot of the nonsense that comes out of Hartford politics. All of the back and forth and trying to deflect attention away from their actions by coming after me shows the desperate nature of Hartford's "leaders". But, I guess when you are potentially committing criminal acts, you will become desperate when you face exposure.

Besides, due to the coverage of Helen and Steve and their links to "We the People", the blog had its best week in traffic since I put the information up first regarding the Mayor's second impending arrest. Almost 2500 people clicked on "cityline" and "notes from Hel" in four days to read the blog. Since I am trying not to aggravate anyone more, I won't say which blog was more popular in their links.

Again, I apologize to any of the "good guys" who took this the wrong way, and to the subjects who actually took offense because I exposed their activities, I stand by what I say 100%.

Friday, January 8, 2010

A NEW ADDITION- VIEW OUR "ONE HARTFORD" PROGRAM HERE ON LINE


Some of you may have already watched our "1 Hartford" program, produced by Stan McCauley, on Hartford Public Access Television. Other's may live outside the coverage area or missed the 10:00PM Saturday airing or Sunday at 8:00AM repeat time.

The show has proven very popular as we discuss issues facing Hartford and also try to discuss possible solutions. The weekly cast of characters include myself, Stan McCauley, retired Hartford Deputy Police Chief Gerry Pleasent, Bishop John Selders and Angel Morales. Special guests occasionally appear, and have included Connecticut Republican Party Chairperson Chris Healey, State Representative Minnie Gonzalez, Hartford Council people Ken Kennedy and Dr. Larry Deutsch among others.

I'm going to try to present a preview of each weeks program, as well as the direct link to the show on Stan's Internet TV station, accesstv.org. Just click and watch.

This week on the program we highlight Hartford Mayor Eddie A. Perez's recent appearance in TIME magazine as one of the 14 "Mugshots of 2009" and discuss whether anyone really is leading Hartford. We also discuss the revelation this week that Hartford Democratic Town Chairperson Sean Arena has apparently been dodging Hartford's high tax rate as both he and his brother register their cars in New Canaan. Bishop Selders brings up the issue of Hartford Schools and the quality of education being delivered.

Is it time for a makeover as the lipstick appears to be coming off the pig? How will Hartford deal with the budget mess and where will the money or the necessary cuts come from. We also discuss the level of continuing corruption at Hartford City Hall as this weeks released Labor decision outlines large thefts from the Tax Collector's Office, yet no request for a Police investigation.

CLICK HERE TO VIEW 1HARTFORD AND FEEL FREE TO COMMENT HERE OR DIRECTLY ON STAN'S WEBSITE