I read the decision. Attorney Krayeske appears to have screwed up bigtime by not returning to Court or offering into evidence the subpoena's or the marshall's return of service....the Judge mentions that....also the Judge mentioned that Attorney Krayeske failed to ask for a capias as to the non-appearing witnesses,which could have gone a long way to prove Nadal's abandment of the New Britain Avenue property..
I read the decision. Attorney Krayeske appears to have screwed up bigtime by not returning to Court or offering into evidence the subpoena's or the marshall's return of service....the Judge mentions that....also the Judge mentioned that Attorney Krayeske failed to ask for a capias as to the non-appearing witnesses,which could have gone a long way to prove Nadal's abandment of the New Britain Avenue property..
ReplyDelete