Search This Blog

Friday, July 30, 2021


 The following report was obtained through a Freedom of Information request from Hartford's Auditors.

This report proves the old adage, you get what you pay for and seems to show that Government operations should not be handed out as political favors, rather than relying on experience in the appropriate fields.

I won't rehash the entire report, but essentially the audit uncovered an alleged pattern and practice of embezzlement of cash funds from the City of Hartford Vital Records Division

Theft of City funds is probably as old as the City of Hartford itself, but unfortunately the safeguards that should be in place to prevent these thefts, are not.

It seems all to often we see these thefts go unchecked, whether it is tens of thousands of dollars from Students Activity accounts at the Board of Education or now a supervisor in the Town Clerks office skimming cash receipts from vital records  by allegedly  voiding cash  transactions and pocketing the cash..

 It also appears, as detailed in the report, the employee knew that auditors were on her heels of tracking  her  criminal deeds  and the employee let herself into City Hall on a Saturday morning to destroy the records that showed her thefts.

The dollar of the thefts is undetermined, essentially because the records have been destroyed by the employee in question, but it is estimated these thefts may have gone on for upwards of two decades.

I hate to say it, but only in Hartford can an employee steal like this, undetected, as they build their pension at the taxpayers expense with little or no fear of detection or criminal prosecution. An employee that had basic management skills should have been on top of this, especially after numerous warnings from auditors. This is what happens when people with no management experience are put in jobs because of their political connections and who they know, not what they know.

The Hartford City Clerk is a political appointment made by the Hartford City Council with no testing process or standardized requirements to manage the Department.

It is also interesting to note that probably one of the most qualified persons who applied for the Town Clerk's position, Eric Lusa. and was passed over. was the person who eventually noticed the suspicious activity and requested City auditors tor "take a deep dive" and investigate the Vital Records operations.  Good job Eric for paying attention and speaking up.




At the request of the Town and City Clerk we completed a follow up audit in July 2021 to specific issues related to transactions recorded by the Vital Records Unit (VRU) supervisor into the City financial system, Munis in 2019, 2020 and 2021. The purpose of the audit was to evaluate and test the accuracy and propriety of transactions processed by the VRU supervisor and other employees as necessary.  The following includes only exceptions noted. The results of our examination were reviewed with N. McGregor, Town and City Clerk and shared with Corporation Counsel.


 The VRU supervisor has been employed by the City for the past 34 years, 17 of those in the VRU of the Town Clerk’s office. We found that there was a complete lack of good internal controls and segregation of duties related to the supervisor’s recording of transactions and preparation of the daily batch balancing and cash deposit process. The supervisor could process daily transactions including MUNIS transaction reversals, collect cash, record sales, reconcile daily work batches and prepare the daily deposit alone with no witness, and then sent to the City treasurer’s office. There was no process to periodically review the supervisor’s work. There were no security cameras in the VRU. The lack of adequate internal controls and appropriate segregation of duties with access to cash, creates an environment extremely susceptible to the misappropriation of funds. During the beginning of our follow up audit in March 2021 we had concerns that the accounting records that we needed to examine may be tampered with or destroyed. We requested that the Town Clerk have the VRU supervisor put on administrative leave during the duration of the audit in order to preserve the accounting records. Just prior to the VRU supervisor being put on administrative leave on April 28, 2021, the VRU supervisor contacted Iron Mountain Enterprise Information Management Company to shred accounting records for the VRU.  The VRU supervisor did this without the knowledge of the Town and City Clerk. We found, with the assistance of the Town Clerk that 2019, part of our investigative period of transactions, and many prior years accounting records were picked up for shredding by Iron Mountain in bins filled by the VRU supervisor on the Saturday before being put on administrative leave. These actions were in direct violation of the State of Connecticut document retention mandates and request for document destruction permission processes mandated by the State. Because most of the 2019 accounting documents were destroyed, we could not fully audit 2019 transactions. During our audit we found that the supervisor’s daily recording of transactions was not in accordance with established VRU procedures followed by the other VRU employees. Although the VRU operating procedures were apparently known by the VRU employees, the procedures were not documented in writing. Of the 92 transactions processed by the supervisor that we had accounting records available for examination, over half were not processed in accordance with established operating procedures. Critical fields in the MUNIS system were either vacant, incomplete, false all of which made it extremely difficult to follow and determine the legitimacy of the transactions. The evidential matter available to us was not sufficient to determine the complete extent of possible improper transaction recordings.




The Vital Records Unit (VRU) of the Town and City Clerk’s (TCC) Office (reports to City Council) is responsible for providing the public with copies of vital records such as birth certificates, marriage licenses, death certificates, burial and cremation permits, disinterment services and notary services.  VRU charges its customers Connecticut State mandated fees ranging from $2 to $50 depending on the type of document.  A portion ($16) of each marriage certificate is remitted to the state of Connecticut’s Department of Public Health.  A majority of the transactions are processed over the counter in the VRU office in City Hall with customers paying with cash and with credit cards.  Customers also request documents by mail, facsimile or through the Internet.  These transactions are paid by money order or credit card.  VRU also bills and collects revenue generated from fees assessed to other cities and towns for document services provided.  VRU uses the Cash Receipt module of the MUNIS Financial Management System (MUNIS) to process and account for cash, checks, money orders and credit card receipts.  

On July 23, 2020, we issued our audit report #2017 covering the Revenue Accounts and Operations of the Vital Records Unit of the Town and City Clerk’s Office. We reported in this report and also in a similar report issued in 2015 the following:

·         During the period from July 1, 2019, to February 14, 2020, we noted 355 reversal of cash receipt transactions totaling $16,910 that were processed in MUNIS by VRU.  There is no indication that these transactions are being monitored, reviewed, and approved by supervisory personnel.  In addition, all VRU employees that receive, and process payments are also able to process reversals.

·         There is no indication that VRU supervisory personnel review the daily cash receipt transactions and summaries to verify that all activity has been properly accounted for throughout the process and recorded in MUNIS as required.  This includes reconciling transactions recorded in MUNIS to applications and other supporting documentation.


The Town Clerk responded that “I was appointed as Town and City Clerk on March 9, 2020. This is an area I have not had a chance to look into because of COVID 19, but do recognize there needs documentation, and verification of reversal transactions by a supervisor. We will work on the comments detailed above and will act to follow-up on and address each of the related recommendations as noted and will work with the Internal Audit Department to develop such directives”. In March 2021, the assistant Town Clerk asked the Chief Auditor if the internal audit department could take a deep dive into MUNIS reversal transactions because he had suspicions of improper accounting entries and possibly misappropriation of City funds perpetrated by the Vital Records supervisor. We met with the Town Clerk and the Assistant Town Clerk and agreed to perform audit work related to management’s concerns.




The scope of our audit included various reviews and tests of transactions recorded by the VRU supervisor and others primarily during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2020, and 2021. We performed tests and reviews of daily cash receipts, bank deposits and related accounting, recording and balancing processes and reviews and tests of credit and voided transactions.




City VRU Records Destroyed During the Investigation


During the beginning of our audit, we had concerns that the 2019 and current accounting records that we needed to examine may be destroyed. We requested that the Town Clerk put the VRU supervisor on administrative leave in order to preserve the accounting records. Before the supervisor was put on administrative leave, she contacted Iron Mountain Enterprise information management company to shred City VRU accounting records without the knowledge of the Town Clerk. We found, with the assistance of the Town Clerk, that most of the 2019 VRU manual accounting record, part of our investigative period, and many prior years accounting records were picked up by Iron Mountain, their secured bins filled by the supervisor, for destruction without the express permission of the Town Clerk or the State of Connecticut. The act of having municipal records destroyed prior to the state’s mandated retention period and during an audit/investigation was in direct violation of the State of Connecticut document retention mandates. Practically all of 2019 manual accounting records/daily work batches were destroyed during our audit that started in March of 2021. The following is an excerpt from the State Document retention mandates, record series title – Cash Receipts, Disbursement ledgers, Journals, Books, etc. Minimum retention period is Fiscal Year End plus three years.



Inadequate Segregation of the Supervisor’s Duties


We found that the internal controls and segregation of duties related to the VRU supervisor’s recording of transactions and preparation of the dialing batch balancing and cash deposit process were inadequate. The VRU supervisor could process daily transactions including the reversal of sale transactions in MUNIS, collect cash, record sale transactions in MUNIS, reconcile daily work batches and prepare the daily deposit with no witness prior to sending it to the City treasurer’s office. There was no process to periodically review the VRU supervisor’s work, as mentioned below, and there were no security cameras in the VRU. The lack of adequate internal controls, management oversite and appropriate segregation of duties, including access to cash, creates an environment susceptible to the misappropriation of funds and inappropriate accounting entries.


Town Clerk Management Oversight


We could not find any evidence that there was any documented management oversight of the VRU supervisor’s work during the past two Town Clerk’s terms. Such management oversite would include periodic documented reviews of the VRU supervisors work in light of a lack of segregation of duties including access to cash transaction recording in MUNIS and solely performing the daily deposit and work batch reconciliations. No management action, to our knowledge, was taken to correct issues reported in our 2015 audit report covering the VRU operations, specifically the issue related to reversals of recorded transactions in MUNIS.


Procedures and Controls


Procedures for the collection, processing, recording, deposit and balancing of cash receipts; and fee billing and collection processes were not adequately documented in writing.  Documenting procedures and controls for key processes in narrative form in writing is a basis for good internal controls and provides management with a baseline for evaluating day-to-day activities and employee performance.  We recommend that TCC management document procedures, process flows and related key controls for the areas noted above in writing.  Ideally, these procedures and process flows should be documented using automated tools such as Microsoft Word or Excel so that they can be easily updated as necessary with any required changes.  Key controls and the individuals/positions responsible for them should be noted where appropriate in the documentation. Although the procedures are not documented in writing, each VRU staff member is required to follow their supervisor’s verbal training in those areas.  The VRU staff was apparently trained on the proper recording of transactions in MUNIS. at the start of each VRU staff employment and they are expected to follow those procedures as follows:


1.      Each customer’s application, for Marriage Licenses, Burial Permits, and Death and Birth Certificates must be separately recorded in MUNIS

2.      All cash receipts should be recorded immediately by the cashier in MUNIS

3.      All checks, cash, money order, and credit cards should be recorded in MUNIS with the correct amount, check/money order and credit cards numbers

4.      At the end of each day, all applications for Marriage Licenses, Burial Permits, Death and Birth Certificates, check images, visa receipts and MUINS payment proof reports must be attached to each VRU staff batch package

5.      All customer transactions must be properly identified in MUNIS

6.      In the “Paid by” field, in the MUNIS cash receipt module, the name of the customer must be recorded

7.      The payment method should be recorded and properly identified with a check or credit card number


As noted in the details that follow the VRU supervisor’s processing of transactions in many instances are not in accordance with the procedures that the staff was trained on when processing like or similar transactions. The results listed below resulted from our audit work which include an examination of 205 MUNIS transaction reversals recorded between July 2019 and April 2021 related to the VRU supervisor’s daily work batches:


1.      In several instances, 159 out of the 205 reversal transactions were not properly identified and were in violation of most of, if not all the seven establish internal processes, procedures and controls listed above specifically as it relates to transaction recordings of Death Certificates. We identified more than 69 of the 205 reversal transactions, where the reversed sale was paid by check, the field in MUNIS identifying the payer was not properly posted. Instead of the name of the customer, as required, the “paid by” field said either “deaths” or “Customer”.  By not posting the customer’s name accurately it would be extremely difficult to identify the actual customer and make it easier to mask a misappropriation of funds.

2.      In the “paid by’’ section labeled Deaths, we found several different funeral homes made payments for Death Certificates that were recorded on one receipt instead of separate receipts for each funeral home as required, payments by check were recorded in MUNIS with no check number or an invalid check number. As a result, we could not trace these transactions to the daily bank deposit. It appears that these types of transactions were recorded in MUNIS to replace actual cash receipts that may not have been included in the daily deposit.

3.      In the “paid by” section labeled Customers, we found several different funeral homes check payments that were recorded for sales other than death certificates such as birth certificates and plastic covers, thing funeral homes do not purchase from the VRU. We contacted the related funeral homes, and we were informed that they did not request any birth certificates or covers from the City of Hartford and that they only purchase copies of death certificates. We also found credit card payments that were improperly recorded as sales of death certificates. These transactions could have the appearance of being made to replace unrecorded cash payments not included in the daily bank deposit.

4.      A reversed check payment made for death certificates, with no other replacing entry in MUNIS, was deposited in the City of Hartford bank account.  On March 2, 2021, the VRU supervisor processed a check totaling $105 for five death certificates and one burial permit. The transaction was recorded in MUNIS, and the customer received five certified death certificates and one burial permit. On March 3, 2021, the VRU supervisor reversed $105 check payment that was previously recorded on March 2, 2021. Later that afternoon, on March 3, 2021, the VRU supervisor prepared the daily batches, March 2, 2021, for deposit, which also included the $105 reversed/unrecorded check payment, in the City bank account. It appears that the deposit of the check related to the reversal of the sale in MUNIS was used to replace cash that was not recorded in MUNIS or deposited in the bank.

5.      We found instances where check payments recorded in MUNIS were completely different form the amount deposited in the bank account. One check was recorded in MUNIS as $105; however, the bank deposit indicated that the check was for $40. It appears that the $65 difference was used to replace $65 of the $105 reversed/unrecorded check deposit mention in item four above.  Also, a check payment totaling $40 was recorded in MUNIS with no check number and we could not find it deposited into the bank. It appears that this check was never remitted by a customer, is not a valid transaction and was made to reconciled MUNIS sales to the daily bank deposit inappropriately.

6.      We found a cash payment made to the VRU that was incorrectly recorded in MUNIS but was in the daily bank deposit. The VRU supervisor received, as evidenced by a signed receipt from a funeral home, $170 cash payment. The cash payment was a reimbursement to the City for an insufficient funds returned check for a transaction purchasing six death certificates for $120 and a $50 bounced check fee. The VRU supervisor recorded in MUNIS $100 for death certificates and $50 for the NFS fee. The VRU supervisor did not follow the proper procedure related to an accounts receivable payment. The proper procedure for an accounts receivable payment is to create a single receipt batch for the total amount received and to notify the City Custody of Funds division, Treasurer’s Department, of the payment. Because the payment was not properly recorded in MUNIS the Custody of Funds division did not clear the accounts receivable amount until February 2021, more than four months after the payment was received. The $20 cash difference between the $120 received and the $100 that was recorded in MUNIS could not be located in the City bank account. The VRU supervisor could not explain the $20 difference.

7.      We found another instance where the VRU supervisor received a check for $200 from a funeral home for the purchase of 10 death certificates; however, we could not find the related entry in MUNIS, but we found the deposit in the bank. It appears that in order to reconcile MUNIS transactions to the bank deposit for that day, the VRU supervisor recorded in MUNIS several fictitious check numbers to total $200. It appears that that these fictitious check numbers and amounts were inappropriately recorded to account for unrecorded funds of $200.  

8.      We found two instances where the VRU supervisor used check payments received, from three separate funeral homes for the purchase of death certificates, to apply in MUNIS to birth certificates and birth certificate plastic cover accounts. A detail review of these transactions indicates the following:

·        One funeral home, applied, paid for, and obtained 20 death certificates and one burial permit for $405 through the VRU supervisor. However, the transaction recorded in MUNIS indicates that the funeral home received a birth certificate plastic cover for $2 and $383.00 for death certificates. The funeral home indicated that they only applied for 20 death certificates ($400) and one burial permit ($5) but didn’t apply for or receive any plastic cover. The difference of $20 not recorded in MUNIS and the cover recording could not be explained by the VRU supervisor. The difference could have the appearance of been used to account for unrecorded cash receipts.

·         Three funeral homes purchased nine copies of two different death certificates, four burial permits and paid a total of $200. However, a review of the related MUNIS transactions indicates that the $200 in checks that were received for death certificates and burial permits, were recorded to the birth certificate and plastic cover charge allocation account.  It appears that the inappropriate transactions made to the birth certificate and plastic cover account was done to account for unrecorded cash receipts.


9.      On July 21, 2020, a customer applied for two separate birth certificates at $20 each.  The applications for a birth certificate copies indicated that one application was for the applicant’s child and the other was for the applicant’s grandchild. The application for the grandchild also indicated that the applicant must present the child’s birth record. A review of the applications indicated that the VRU supervisor approved the customer application and when questioned the VRU supervisor did admit that the applications were approved. Based on the VRU supervisor approval, it appears that a $40 payment was received for the birth certificates, and they were given to the customer. We could not find the related transaction in MUNIS, nor could we find the cash deposit in the bank.


10.  Our review of 707 receipts recorded in MUNIS and labeled not reversed disclosed that 43 were manually reversed. We noted that 23 of the 43 transactions were for, either incomplete receipt and cash/credit payments and adjustments for reconciled items.  It should be noted that 15 out of the 23 transactions were for credit card payments.  We could not determine the reasons for this transaction due to a lack of MUNIS documentation.


11.  A review of two of the VRU supervisor’s daily transactions batches, dated October 28, 2020, and July 21, 2020, disclosed that the VRU supervisor recorded in MUNIS, on October 28,2020, a cash payment of $20 for a copy of a marriage certificate. The recording was part of the total cash payments of $240. However, on October 29, 2020, the VRU supervisor included in the daily cash payments of only $220. On November 23, 2020, the VRU supervisor was informed by the Treasurer department that the daily batch did not match the deposit received by the bank. On November 24, 2020, the VRU supervisor, without conducting a due diligent research, reversed $20 from a check amount received from a funeral home for a death certificate. On the day of the initial October 28, 2020, recording, the VRU supervisor received $120 for six death certificates and the amount was correctly recorded in MUNIS and was part of the daily deposit. We also noted that on October 28, 2020, the Vital Records supervisor recorded in MUNIS a cash payment of $20 for a copy of a marriage certificate. This recording has part of the customer’s name, the amount, payment method and was never reversed in MUNIS.  An actual copy of the application was found in the VRU supervisor’s daily batch package. After a review of the marriage certificate, we determine that the customer received a copy of the marriage certificate.  It is our opinion that an actual customer came to the Vital Records office and apply for a copy of a marriage certificate, received a copy, and paid the correct amount in cash. However, the Vital Records supervisor could not account for the missing $20. We could not determine what happen to the $20 cash payment between the day of the transaction and the day it was prepared for deposit. 


Interview with the VRU Supervisor


On June 16, 2021, a meeting was held with the VRU supervisor to explain the business purpose of several accounting transactions and other related issues noted in this report. In attendance were the Chief Auditor, VRU Supervisor, HEMEA Union Representative and two Internal Audit Staff. During the two-hour meeting, the Supervisor could not adequately explain the business reason for entering numerous transactions into MUNIS related to VRU cash, credit card and check transactions. Most of the Supervisor’s answers to Internal Audit’s questions were, I do not remember or do not know the answer, or it must be a mistake. The business reasons for adjusting/reversing transactions were not documented or could not be explained in most questioned instances. At times the Supervisor was agitated and confrontational.


Town Clerk Management Actions Taken to Date


This memo is to provide an update on steps taken by the Town Clerk to remedy identified concerns in the Vital Records Unit. This update is not a completed list of the corrections that need to be made but we hope are steps taken immediately to correct past accounting deficiencies.


  1. Installed IQS accounting software which will detail each transaction and will eliminate reversals and manual input to MUNIS. Each transaction is identified and put into separate accounts therefore removing Transcript of Records as the sole depository of transactions
  2. Installed receipt printers at POS, with connected cash drawers.
  3. Deposits are done with two persons in Town Clerk’s office under cameras.
  4. Safes repaired and are able be locked.
  5. Security cameras ordered and waiting vendor installation.
  6. Corrected process of collecting of NSF.
  7. We are in the process of updating all policy and procedures.
  8. Card key will be required to enter secured working area from lobby of Vital Records Unit.
  9. Removed Vital Records supervisor as authorized on Iron Mountain account to shred records, the Town Clerk will be the only authorized person.


Next Steps


  • The Town Clerk will keep the Internal Audit Department up to date with future actions taken to improve the controls in the VRU.    
  • The Town Clerk will determine the appropriate personnel action to take, if any, related the VRU supervisor and he will work with the City Human Relations office and the City Corporation Counsel’s office based on the action he deems appropriate.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  







City Council Members                                                                                                                                                                                   

Internal Audit Commission Members                                                                                                                                                            

L. Bronin, Mayor                                                                                           

A. Cloud, Treasurer

J. Hockenhull, Chief Financial Officer          

T. Montanez, Chief Operating Officer

L.A. Ralls, Finance Director

H. Rifkin, Corporation Counsel

V. Rossitto, Partner, Blum Shapiro


Monday, June 7, 2021



E-mail begging for staffing help at HPD , Sunday ,June 6,2021

I'm not sure when Hartford City Hall is going to start paying attention to the disaster that the Hartford Police Department Administration has become.

At the risk of beating a dead horse, the number of officers jumping ship to get away from the floundering department should be alarming. All recruitment efforts have pretty much been in vain as the numbers of good officers, including  minority and female officers have become the feeder system for just about every other Department in the state. And to be quite honest, what Police Chief would not gladly hire a Hartford Police officer (in good standing)in a heartbeat. With all due respect to Police Officers statewide ,Hartford Police Officers   experience more in their first year on the job than most others in smaller departments may see in their entire careers.

But sadly, most officers are not bailing from HPD because of lower pay or benefits. The reason I keep being told is the lack of leadership and feeling unappreciated ,has forced officers to start looking elsewhere.

I would almost say, it is not a lack of leadership...there is no leadership'

For the Memorial Day Weekend, staffing levels were so bad, officers were ordered in and days off were canceled. For the good of the Department  and the safety of the City, I could understand that move. Even though I think it is the height of incompetence to let staffing levels get that low and no one is concerned.

But then, after ordering officer's in and telling them that days off are cancelled., their Chief takes off and heads to Florida. Now there's a morale builder move

And the "not-in-command" staff  were so concerned about the City, they weren't paying attention to the violence or distributing data to their officers or sharing data with Community partners to stem the violence. No the HPD brain trust was more concerned firing off e-mails trying to figure out who would be manning the grill for hot dogs and hamburgers on Memorial Day. That sounds like a Lieutenants position that is wasted money.

Jason Thody is and has been the furthest thing from being the poster child for "leadership by example". Instead he should be writing the book "how not to act as a Police Chief" or maybe "Being a Police Chief for Dummies"

For Thody to leave the City as Homicides are spiking and typically one of the busiest  events, the Puerto Rican Day Parade, is taking place is unbelievable. And then for his not in "Command Staff" to have to issue a Mayday call begging for help is amazing and shows the condition HPD is in.

We can only hope that Thody's trip to Florida was a one-way ticket. 

Its time to shine the "Batman beacon" over the City of Hartford and get a real Chief that can lead.

Tuesday, May 4, 2021



In a strongly worded letter, The Greater Hartford African American Alliance,  under the leadership of their President, J. Stan McCauley, has drafted a letter, to be delivered to Mayor Luke Bronin tomorrow, The document will be hand delivered to Mayor  Bronin tomorrow after a public press conference and the reading of the letter on the steps of Hartford City Hall at 12:00 noon. The Alliance is calling for the immediate removal of Police Chief Jason Thody, after the recently publicized assault of a female prisoner at HPD Booking facility and based upon Thody's  history of "lack of integrity, personal conduct and failure to establish a culture of transparency, fairness and equal opportunity". The letter cites many of Thody's failures and bad deeds during his tenure.

The text of the full letter to be delivered to Mayor Bronin tomorrow is below:

The Honorable Mayor Luke Bronin

 City Hall ,550 Main Street, Room 200

Hartford, Connecticut 06103 

Mayor Luke Bronin, 

The Greater Hartford African American Alliance (The Alliance) is writing to call your attention to the horrific misconduct of an on-duty white police sergeant who assaulted a black civilian woman while she was in the custody and care of the City of Hartford, and we demand immediate redress. There is no longer trust, legitimacy, or confidence in the ability of the Hartford Police Department (HPD) to police itself. Misconduct appears to be the order of the day. The announced outcomes of recent disciplinary actions of HPD personnel involved with the “Dead Pool'' appear not to be factual, transparent, nor appropriate for the nature of the offenses committed; equally alarming are the unannounced outcomes for the personnel involved from the Office of the State’s Attorney. Systemic inaction is complicit with prejudiced biases, destroys social connectivity, decreases community resistance to crime and has eroded the public’s trust in the local justice system. We insist that an independent federal entity, unaffiliated with the City of Hartford or the State of CT, perform a comprehensive investigation and prosecution of the police sergeant. Because building trust and legitimacy on both sides of the police-citizen divide is the foundational principle guiding relationships between law enforcement and the communities they serve, oversight by the United States Department of Justice (USDOJ) of the Hartford Police Department and the Office of the State’s Attorney is warranted to avert further erosion of the public’s trust.

 The Alliance supports the “Statement from Greater Hartford NAACP Regarding the Assault of an AfricanAmerican Woman by Hartford Police Officer” released to the press on April 27, 2021, calling for the immediate termination of the police sergeant, a person in a supervisory position within HPD.

 It is evident HPD has lost its credibility within the community with ongoing inappropriate behavior, and within its ranks, as officers continue to leave the department in droves. Recent media highlight incidents which illustrate the lack of ethics, morals and values, and inconsistent levels of discipline.

 Chief Jason Thody’s lack of integrity, personal conduct; and failure to establish a culture of transparency, fairness and equal opportunity; raise questions about his values and ability to lead this Department. Jason Thody’s ongoing violation of the civil rights of sworn personnel under his command, and his incidents of poor judgment, demonstrate a lack of social and emotional intelligence.

 There is a confirmed report in 2010 which indicates Thody, while he served at the rank of Lieutenant, got into a barroom incident while off-duty, and he was later disciplined and subsequently demoted “for conduct unbecoming an employee, and for knowingly and willfully making a false entry in any Department or other official report or record”. A citizen reported in May 2020 that Thody, while he served as Police Chief, was erratically driving a City of Hartford police vehicle, struck a guardrail, caused property damage and evaded the scene; claiming he was on the way to a Black Lives Matter event (a peaceful protest in response to the murder of George Floyd by a Minneapolis police officer), which he never attended. 

 Sound decision making is the foundation and an essential characteristic of effective leadership; which was not on display when Chief Thody allocated more than one million dollars for administrative vehicles while leaving the HPD fleet for patrol officers in disrepair. This decision negatively impacts HPD’s ability to respond to calls for service in a safe and timely manner, which jeopardizes the community at large.

 Jason Thody is the defendant in multiple unresolved lawsuits concerning civil rights and discrimination violations, including his refusal to act in a sexual harassment complaint filed by a member of HPD. Not only that, there are also multiple active complaints filed with the Commission on Human Rights and Opportunities (CHRO) against Jason Thody in his role as the Assistant Chief responsible for Internal Affairs, prior to his appointment as Chief of Police. These CHRO complaints involve disparate treatment asserting the practice and use of vindictive and retaliatory investigations (against Black, Latino, female and LGBTQ+ members of the department, including persecuting their allies) which have served to systematically block the advancement of officers of color and protected classes. Chief Thody’s actions / inactions undermine the tenets of procedural justice. He has repeatedly shown his indifference to the plight of and ability to effectively serve a community of color, and he has failed to create a sustainable environment to recruit, retain and promote a diverse cadre of police personnel.

 The Alliance embraces the theories of community policing and the belief its success depends on promoting organizational strategies supportive of the systematic use of partnerships and problem-solving techniques, and hosted a Virtual Town Hall featuring HPD Chief Jason Thody, as the keynote on the evening of Thursday, October 22, 2020, to discuss public safety. During this opportunity, Thody did very little to forge mutual trust and cooperation as his statements were less than truthful and evasive when asked about his operational and administrative plans, which provided further proof he lacks the guardian mindset required to build public trust and legitimacy. 

Disingenuously, when campaigning for the permanent position as Chief, Jason Thody committed to assembling a diverse command staff, which would reflect the demographics of the City of Hartford and comply with the Cintron v. Vaughn Federal Consent Decree and CT General Statute 7-291A. To date, he has not promoted any person of color or any other protected class member to a command position from within HPD. In September 2020, rather than using the historical practice of extending an active promotional list for a year, at no cost to the City, Chief Thody elected to discard the promotional list, which contained two females and a black male, all with graduate degrees and substantial years of service, who could have been promoted. Then in April 2021, less than seven months later, exams have been announced for Lieutenants and Captains to be held in July 2021, at a cost of tens of thousands of dollars to the City, while we are actively negotiating budgets and allocation of resources to meet the City’s needs. Discarding the promotional list was neither in compliance with the federal consent decree nor was it an “efficient allocation of City resources”, as is the goal of the FY2022 City of Hartford Budget. Moreover, better use of these funds could have been towards the training and deployment of non-law enforcement responders to non-violent calls for service or to upgrade the fleet of police vehicles for the patrol staff.

 Hartford is but a heartbeat away from being featured in the headlines of the national news! Courageous action and intentionality are required to own and address problems in the Hartford Police Department BEFORE matters get out of control. Punching an unarmed woman in custody, in the presence of subordinate personnel, on camera, is the canary in the mine! We find it curious that this incident was only brought to the Office of the State’s Attorney for investigation after the story was published by a local reporter, over two and a half weeks after the incident, which was neither “proactive or quick”.

 It is also disturbing that, in defiance of the new Police Accountability Bill Public Act 20-1, the video was not released within 96 hours of the incident. Additionally, the entire unedited video has yet to be released which speaks to the lack of transparency. There are reports of additional misconduct by this same police sergeant after the initial assault.

The community of Hartford expects and deserves racial reconciliation, and the Alliance will not tolerate the continued mistreatment of people of color and members of protected classes, external or internal to HPD. Beginning in May 2021, we are aware that interviews will be conducted for the position of sergeant, and we expect those vacancies to be filled free of any discriminatory practices and by diverse personnel who reflect the community.

 Therefore, in addition to the NAACP’s demand for the immediate termination of the police sergeant, the Alliance is also demanding that Chief Jason Thody be immediately relieved of his duties as Police Chief of the City of Hartford. The restoration to build public trust and legitimacy will not occur with Jason Thody at the helm. Based on Thody’s history of ignoring federal and state law, he should be prohibited from independently making any further promotions or appointments. To truly change the culture of the HPD, procedural justice must be the guiding principle for internal and external policies and practices; and the community must also have the ability to verify a credible system of accountability, which currently only exists on paper, and must start with competent, ethical and trustworthy leadership.

 Without action by our “Strong Mayor”, the Alliance will be forced to refer these matters to higher authorities. We look forward to your confirmation of receipt and advisement.


 J. Stan McCauley,

 President Greater Hartford African American Alliance The Greater Hartford African American Alliance (The Alliance) is an unincorporated, nonpartisan alliance of individuals and organizations joined together to share information, design strategies, and advocate for actions that benefit African American communities within Greater Hartford, Connecticut. We exist to enhance the economic, educational, health, environmental, spiritual, social and cultural experiences of African Americans within the Greater Hartford region. We provide a forum for open dialogue regarding current issues and events of interest to identify key priorities, to establish community consensus and to set an agenda toward collective action. 

MEDIA REFERENCES: Police Say Officer Violated Code Of Conduct - Courant Community, May 28, 2010 - Hartford Courant After another round of scrutiny, Hartford city council recommends confirmation of Interim Police Chief Jason Thody February 4, 2020 By Rebecca Lurye Hartford Courant Resolution Calls for the Suspension of Hartford Police Chief, Published July 12, 2020 - NBC Connecticut Hartford Police Chief Disciplined After Crash in Department-Issued Vehicle, Published July 13, 2020 - NBC Connecticut Hartford Police Chief Jason Thody was involved in an accident in his department-issued vehicle on Route 154 in Chester in May. Hartford detective demoted, suspended for suggesting bet on first homicide of 2021, Dec. 8, 2020 By Minyvonne Burke - NBC News The Hartford police chief said the text "represents an appalling lack of judgment" and "an extreme insensitivity toward our community." Hartford police chief who evaded responsibility in May accident suspends officer for 120 days for joking text message Editorial Posted by: Pat Droney | December 7, 2020 - Law Enforcement Today Hartford police chief says use of force chosen by officer 'doesn't conform to policy', April 28, 2021 - Fox61 Staff Hartford Police Sergeant James Guzie is accused of use of force against a woman who was being booked at the time.

Wednesday, April 28, 2021


The link is below for anyone interested in looking at the City of Hartford Budget for 2022



The Police Accountability bill passed in 2020 was supposed to build the public's trust in Law Enforcement and bring much needed transparency to a difficult profession. The Connecticut Legislature in their rush to look politically correct passed the bill.

Unfortunately, with recent everts in the Hartford Police Department after a Police Sergeant assaulted a female prisoner, I had to attempt to navigate the law to try to obtain body cam footage of the event. The law is pretty specific, the video was required to be released within 96 hours after request by a member of the public. Despite my written request to Detective Denise Mendoza , who handles requests at HPD, to release the video, it was ignored.

It was obvious that Hartford Police Chief Jason Thody and his minions had no problem in breaking the law in their efforts to keep their dirty laundry from public view. As the clock continued to tick ,the 96 hour requirement came and went by days. I eventually called a State Senator and asked him to get involved as well as e-mails to various State Officials and Media people and community partners.

One State official I spoke with understood my frustration and reluctantly advised me the Police Accountability Bill "has no teeth". So what good is it if Police Chiefs or others feel they can break the law without any repercussions or any mechanism for enforcement..

I received all types of guesses from everyone I called asking where to turn to get enforcement for someone breaking the Police Accountability Law. Besides being told the bill had no teeth, no one could answer me. Maybe the Attorney General, maybe the Chief States Attorney, maybe the Freedom of Information Commission, maybe I had to hire my own attorney and bring a legal action through the courts.

Should a private citizen have to hire an attorney to get Chief Thody to obey the law?

And despite the spin Thody and Mayor Bronin put on this matter that they did the "right thing" and the system worked, it did not. 

I had originally asked for ALL video of the event, not what they wanted to release to make themselves look good or lessen the impact. (I am not sure that there is anyway to make yourself look good when one of your Officer's punches a female prisoner in the head on video, no matter how you edit it) The arrest warrant affidavit states there were at least four body cams that captured video as well as permanently mounted security cameras recording.

The system might have worked If Thody had honored the letter of the law and released the video in the time frame required. The system might have worked if Thody released ALL of the video as requested.

But corruption only breeds more corruption  when it is allowed to happen. If the Legislature and the Law Enforcement profession are serious about cleaning up their act, changes need to be made. Police Chief's and people like Jason Thody need to be sent a real message that business as usual is no longer acceptable and it is time to clean up their acts.