Search This Blog

Friday, October 22, 2010

IN SOME CIRCLES THIS MIGHT BE CALLED "PATRONIZING A PROSTITUTE"

A couple weeks ago we found out that Former Hartford Mayor, and now convicted felon,Eddie A. Perez had landed a job at the Connecticut AIDS Resource Coalition (CARC). During Perez's tenure as Mayor CARC has received millions of dollars in City funding. Last year alone the City provided funding to CARC of over half a million dollars.




This week, WNPR's Jeff Cohen reported that Perez's former Chief of Staff Matthew Hennessy has just received a $58,000 lobbying contract as a result of an agreement with the Hartford Public Schools and Connecticut Public Broadcasting to find federal funding for the Hartford Journalism and Media Academy.

I thought the icing on the cake would be Perez's former Corporation Counsel John Rose landing a job with the Crumbie Law Group. Rose had used the Crumbie Law Group as "outside counsel" while he was in office. WNPR's Jeff Cohen got the actual numbers, and today reported on Crumbie's billing to the taxpayers of Hartford.



In Fiscal year 2009, Crumbie’s firm made $155,599.44; in FY 2010, the firm made $252,580.24; and so far in 2011, the firm has made $22,564.80, according to Cohen.

In Cohen's report he quotes a statement from the Crumbie Law Group touting Rose's expertise. Too bad he didn't have that same expertise before he hired the Crumbie Law Group as outside counsel, he could have saved the taxpayers of Hartford almost a half a million dollars. I guess that is what they call job security on Rose's part though.

Like I said, I thought that would be the icing on the cake. Nope, not in Hartford.

I received several calls today regarding last nights Hartford 2000 meeting. For those not aware, Hartford 2000 is the parent organization that oversees Hartford's neighborhood groups, or "NRZ's". Apparently, the position of Executive Director is open. The position had tentatively been filled by a person from West Hartford. That's a discussion for another day as to why a Hartford resident couldn't be found, but I digress.

The callers were upset that the City of Hartford's COO David Panagore was in attendance at the meeting and was advocating for a potential new Executive Director. Low and behold, "drumroll please", ta daaaaa, Panagore's choice for Executive Director is no other than former Perez Chief of Staff Susan McMullen.



Ok, hopefully by now you have picked yourself up off the floor and are coming out of that fit of laughter or fit of anger. Both of those would be appropriate reactions depending on how much you know about Susan McMullen.

If you aren't familiar with some of McMullen's better efforts on the part of the people of Hartford, one of her best that comes to mind was Eddie Perez's "dyslexia defense". McMullen might have been one of the number one reasons for the conviction of Perez as a crook and a fraud when she tried to convince the jury that Perez suffered from being unable to read properly and that is why committed illegal acts.

I think that helped the jury see him and his staff for what they actually were (and by the actions detailed above, what they still are), a group of ethically and morally challenged people.

Requests for comment from Panagore have not been returned.

I have received numerous calls from people asking "Where is the Mayor on these things?" and "Why aren't we hearing anything from the Council on this?". The simple answer is, quite frankly, that I can't figure it out. The underlying acceptance of corruption in Hartford City government has to change. With our so called "leaders" turning a blind eye to these activities it sends a message that business as usual, business as conducted during the Perez years, is OK.

I am sure that is not the message Mayor Segarra wants to send. He has done too many positive things since taking office to be tainted by the stench of these actions. But by remaining silent, he is condoning these actions. A strong statement needs to be made that these fine examples of more cronyism are not acceptable to the Mayor or the people of Hartford.

Do we really think that we need Hennessy to lobby Washington politicians for money? We have the number three or four Congressman in the country representing Hartford. I would hope that a phone call from Congressman Larson would do more than any $58,000 contract given to Hennessy. Not to mention the question, what honest self respecting politician would go anywhere near a "lobbyist" that just came from a stint in what is most likely the most corrupt administration that the City of Hartford has ever seen?

And an open message to Mayor Segarra and even Council President Winch: you have an opportunity to show us and everyone else that Hartford does have a conscience and we are getting back on track. End this nonsense now with prompt and decisive actions. The people of Hartford I'm sure will thank you for cracking down on the political prostitutes leeching off our city.

24 comments:

Pepe LaFlume said...

Kevin...maybe the NRZ's should be organized to protest the attempt to put in Susan McMullen.

On another note,it could be that Mayor Segarra,nice and competant as he is,doesnt have the intestinal fortitude to block this cronyism or perhaps there is or was some underlining agreement as they left...

Jay said...

Panagore rhymes with panawhore. This carpetbagging newcomer is beholden to the felon for his job and is still paying the piper. Are you really surprised?

Freedom From Political Prostitutes said...

These political prostitutes wont stop unless and until the Mayor and the Council steps in and stops the leeching off the citizens of Hartford.

The Mayor can make a call to Sandy Borges,who he appointed,and request that the Crumbie Law Firm be taken off the city lawyer referral list.The Mayor and Council could convene a meeting of the whole or Kennedy could conduct a OMB meeting and subpoena and bring in Felon Perez and the CARC folks..as well as Hennessey and the BOE folks and grill them for the record and under the spotlight..

Anonymous said...

Kevin,


Talking about picker-uppers,
how is Angelito Morales doing?

-Chucho

peter brush said...

The Mayor can make a call to Sandy Borges,who he appointed,and request that the Crumbie Law Firm be taken off the city lawyer referral list.
------------------------------------
Sounds reasonable to me.

Anonymous said...

Pedrito,

we see, want we want to see, when we think we have the power of seeing.

If THEY do not see what "WE THE PEOPLE" aka K Brookman see,

we be stupid, corrupt and not knowledgeable of reality -Freaky Shirts...

Anonymous said...

Pedrito Brush,

What u think - En Espanol, Que Tu Cre.

peter brush said...

we be stupid, corrupt and not knowledgeable of reality -Freaky Shirts...
-----------------------------------
Hard to disagree. Also, to comprender.
But, pretty sure the Yankees aren't going to be able to pull this series out against the los Tejanos.

Anonymous said...

He has done too many positive things since taking office to be tainted by the stench of these actions.
------------------------------------
Stop kissing the mayor's b***.
IT IS NOT WORKING.
He did many positive things except CLEAN HOUSE.
Don't you get it?

Bruce Rubenstein said...

What's the fkn point of firing anyone from city hall close to Felon Perez if they will shortly reappear as employees of city funded non-profit or as a lobbyist for a city organization or as an employee of a firm or business receing vast sums of money from Hartford? They might as well keep the crooks and corrupt at city hall.

Anonymous said...

I am in agreement with Kevin on this, but how do you bar Susan from the job? What's your legal basis? She was never convicted of anything. If you were going for a job and the Mayor stepped in and prevented your getting it, what would you do? Sue the Mayor and the city, most likely.

Steve said...

Re Matt H being hired to manage grants for the Bd of Ed, isn't the city moving towards consolidating services that both the city + Bd perform to save $$$, e.g., procurement, human resources, etc.? Maybe not. The city can't even consolidate its own services... The city has duplication of services in that it has both a "Grants Administration" office in Management and Budget AND a "Grants Management Division" in Development Services. Sounds like a lot of management and administrative costs to me, just sayin'... The city could actually spend more of its grant dollars on completing real capital projects instead of spending a good deal on numerous duplicative city offices/staff that perform the same service. What do I know? I have a degree in art history.

peter brush said...

What's your legal basis?
-----------------------------------
I do think the word "corruption" might be a tad strong with respect to these recent matters which don't involve criminality. Perhaps the terms "unseemly," "cronyism," "of bad odor."
Getting rid of a given cadre of apparatchiks is fine, but the game will just go on with new players. We have what I think they call a "structural problem." Fixing it requires reducing the scope of muni. govt. Not that $ is necessarily corrupting, but it motivates/facilitates in that direction. If the municipal government were to limit itself to its original function of providing order there would be less money to hand out to contractors,law firms,do-gooder NGOs, and there'd be fewer return favors to pols and bureaucrats.
If the municipal govt. were to merely aim at improving its bond rating (I have a dream...) we could cut taxes, make the place more attractive to business and normal civilized folk, and , who knows, perhaps achieve as much if not more in the way of "social justice." Heck, to the extent we're concerned about sleaze we should consider turning down fed/state grants for this or that social cause; Eddie's AIDS issue, for example.
In the mean time, we have a mayor who ran for office promising "more and better social services to the communities."
Yankees ran out of gas in August. Hasta el ano proximo.
Steve: There are worse than art history. You don't have a law degree, do you?

Bruce Rubenstein said...

Peter..call it whatever you wish...it is still bad and wrong.


City government will be cut in the near future with perhaps an oversight board in Hartford's near future,much like Waterbury had.

One serious problem is that the city revenue stream isnt fit for 2010.We have an ever increasing NGO,non-profit and increasing amount of state buildings here..all of which are non taxable and the pilot program needs serious adjustment.

Another problem is the tax situation.The downtown element under Felon Perez received a 40 million dollar bailout or gift in the last reval due to Perez's largesse, atht e expense of the neighborhoods.Citizens are way over-taxed for the services they get.

Another problem is that city hall and its outlining partnerships with NGO's and non profits remains a cesspool for the criminals,corrupt,cronys and incompetants.

One last problem we have...and it is by no means the last problem, but for space reasons I will just outline this one ..is the amount of criminals,corrupt,cronys and incompetants in elected officials and within both major parties...we have to clear the deks of these leeches one way or another in order for Hartford to have any chance of rebuilding itself.All too often the "nest mayor" just brings in a new set of crimianls and cronys to rip off the city..

Goats Head Soup said...

I wouldn't hire Susan McMullen to pick up trash. Oh wait, she has a lot of experience with trash.

Anonymous said...

Pedrito Bush,

Nen~a,
tu eres una abogada?

Que vaina, dejame sabe con~o. Tengo unas circunstancias que una tigresa como tu me puede ayada.

Papa ayudame.

Oh, Mira Tiger Wooo, Gracias for the Tejanos shout-out man.

Anonymous said...

Bicha- Kevin,


Talking about picker-uppers,
how is Angelito Morales doing?

tu amorsito is doing.

-Chucho part 2

Anonymous said...

I thought acquiring and managing grants for the Hartford schools was Roldan's job?

peter brush said...

Tengo unas circunstancias...
------------------------------------
Don't we all...
------------------------------------
The city has duplication of services in that it has both a "Grants Administration" office in Management and Budget AND a "Grants Management Division" in Development Services. Sounds like a lot of management and administrative costs to me, just sayin'
----------------------------------
You may be just sayin', but I don't hear anybody contradictin'.

Bruce Rubenstein said...

Memo to Pedro...

The BOE runs it meetings in accordance with Roberts Rules of Order.

Someone who voted in the affirmative can make a Motion To Recind, in accordance with Roberts Rules...if the vote is 4 to 4 or more in the negative against Hennessey's appointment then the appointment of Hennessey is recinded.

You should most certainly call Ada or Stallings,whom you appointed and get this done.Anyone at the BOE could have called Congressman Larson to get the grant money.He would be happy to do it FREE and thereby the City would save $58,000.

Anonymous said...

Again,

Why didn't this mayor clean house?

Chris said...

This is just my own naive theory, but maybe Segarra can not clean house as it was part of the deal brokered by the convicted felon when he finally stepped down. What else could it be? Does anyone else have any theories?

Willie Nunez said...

First of all, I have to say that I like what Sagarra has done so far, with one exception,he hasnt cleaned house fast enough for me but then again maybe he is just being very careful.

Secondly I dont think Pedro Segarra would make a deal with Eddie Perez about a thing.I just think Segarra is hesitent to act because he doesnt see himself as being the overly aggressive type that Perez was and will let the process play itself out.

Joe The Plumber said...

Rose,McMullen,Hennessey and Perez should be picked up for prostitution, of the political system.